What is review paper

A combination of the problem and the conclusions. Maximum length according to the Journal instructions. No figures or citations should be included here. Keywords keywords. Should be descriptive.

The title words should not be repeated here. Introduction It should state the objective, the problem - the research question to be addressed, provide a concise background: why the work was done, quote literature only with direct bearing on the problem - not a textbook, state a hypothesis — a suggested solution to the problem.

Should be short and concise. Must be possible to derive from the results and discussion. It is not a summary of the paper.

No references. Read the abstract, introduction and conclusions Is there a clear message? Having read the introduction — can you find out what the contribution of the paper is?

Try to formulate the message in your own words. This can be used later in the reviewer summary. Do the perceptions or hypotheses in the introduction match the conclusions? You should be able to find this out within half an hour of reading.

After this you will probably have a first impression of whether the paper is worth publishing or not. If you are still positive , then continue the review process.

If you are negative , you can probably already explain why the paper is not worth publishing. Detailed review Materials and methods Experiments : are the experiments documented adequately?

Model derivations : is the process model derived properly? Is it already known? Results : are they presented so that you can easily see their significance? Data analysis : have statistics been used in an appropriate way? Is the raw data presented in such a way that you can see if the statistical method is adequate? Is the data normally distributed so that standard deviations are motivated? Are outliers discussed?

Figures : Can the figures explain the results? Are the figure captions informative? Tables : are all the inputs in the tables necessary to understand the message? Discussion Note that the discussion section makes the paper scientific! Can the author explain and interpret the results? Can you relate the discussion to the hypotheses? A meta-analysis compares and combines the findings of previously published studies, usually to assess the effectiveness of an intervention or mode of treatment.

Related reading: 5 differences between a research paper and a review paper The complete guide to writing a brilliant research paper. Answered by Editage Insights on 30 Mar, Resources for authors and journals.

Upvote this Answer 34 Comment. Answer: Hi, I think you need to check out this article, if this helpful for you. Upvote this Answer 10 Comment. Answer: what is the meaning of an overview article? Upvote this Answer 25 Comment. Answer: Hi everyone. Upvote this Answer 14 Comment. Answer: its a nice one. Upvote this Answer 1 Comment. Answer: Research paper sometimes referred to as empirical or primary sources, report on original research.

Answered by Christian Baker on 30 Jul, Tutor. Upvote this Answer 8 Comment. Answer: h. Answer: It is the most frequently asked question lately! Let me keep it simple! Answer: A research paper is all about research and a review paper tells you about giving reviews.

Upvote this Answer Comment. Answer: A research paper is an extended form of an essay. Answer this question. Ask a new question. This content belongs to the Conducting Research Stage Conducting research is the first and most exciting step in a researcher's journey.

No Yes. Show comments. Follow this Question. Recent Searches Review paper Responding to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Scope and delimitations Open access Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Editor assigned Types of articles "Reject and Resubmit" status Decision in process Conflict of interest. While there is no particular form that a discussion section must take there are several considerations that a writer must follow when building a discussion.

A review paper is not a pure summary of the information you read for your review. You are required to analyze, synthesize, and interpret the information you read in some meaningful way. It is not enough to simply present the material you have found, you must go beyond that and explain its relevance and significance to the topic at hand. Establish a clear thesis from the onset of your writing and examine which pieces of your reading help you in developing and supporting the ideas in your thesis.

Because the conclusions section often gets left for last it is often the weakest part of a student review paper. It is as crucial a part of the paper as any and should be treated as such. A good conclusion should illustrate the key connections between your major points and your thesis as well as they key connections between your thesis and the broader discussion—what is the significance of your paper in a larger context? Make some conclusions —where have you arrived as a result of writing this paper?